Category Archives: Undocumented Workers

Does FLSA protection apply to undocumented aliens without work authorization?

Ead

Are aliens without employment authorization entitled to FLSA protection?

Yes. Aliens withoutemployment authorization are nevertheless entitled to federal employment protection. Patel v. Quality Inn South, 846 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1988), cert, denied, 109 S.Ct. 1120 (1989)   [Entitlement to FLSA protection]; Matter of Reyes, 814 F.2d 168 (5th Cir. 1987)- [In FSLA/MASAWPA case, plaintiffs did not have to divulge their alienage as documented/undocumented or their citizenship, as those matters were irrelevant in regard to recovery]; Antenor v. D&S Farms, 88 F.3d 925 (11th Cir. 1996)  [Growers are joint employers with labor contractors for purposes of FLSA and AWPA].

Do pre-employment expenses go to into the calculation of the minimum wage?

Yes. FLSA protection extends to paying for farmworkers transportation to the U.S., for visa and immigration fees, and for pre-employment expenses which primarily benefit the growers. Arriaga v. Florida Pacific Farms, LLC, 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002);  Martinez-Bautista v. D & S Produce, 447 F.Supp.2d 954, 963-64 (E.D. Ark. 2006) [Farmworkers entitled to pre-employment expenses including transportation costs and visas which should go into the calculation of the minimum wage].

Does FLSA protection include protection from retaliation?

Yes. FLSA protection also includes protection from retaliation. Contreras v. Corinthian Vigor Insurance Brokerage, Inc., 103 F.Supp.2d 1180 (N.D. Cal. 2000),  reported in 11 Interpreter Releases 1158-60 (Aug. 14, 2000).

Do FLSA claims remain post-Hoffman?

 Yes. FLSA claims remain post – Hoffman Plastic. Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 393 F.Supp.2d 295, 320-32 (D.N.J. 2005) [Hoffman Plastics does not bar FLSA claim by undocumented janitors]; Flores v. Amigon, 233 F.Supp.2d 462 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) [Refused discovery request regarding employee's immigration status because it is not relevant to back wage claim for violation of FLSA]; Singh v. Jutla & CD. & R’s Oil, Inc., 214 F.Supp.2d 1056 (N.D. Cal. 2002) [Court declined to extend Hoffman to preclude a claim for retaliatory discharge based upon employer informing DHS to arrest undocumented employee]; Ulloa v. Al’s All Tree Service, Inc., 768 N.Y.S. 2d 556 (D.C. 2d 2003) [Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. does not bar FLSA claim].

How does FLSA apply to detained aliens?

At least one court has found that a detained alien has no right under FLSA to receive more than $l/day paid by INS for work because s/he is not an employee, Alvarado-Guevara v. INS, 902 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1990), and at least one court has found that requiring persons to work at Oakdale Detention Center does not violate the Thirteenth Amendment.   Channer v. Hall, 112 F.3d 214 (5th Cir. 1997)

.

You may call our law office at (954) 946-8130 to see if you have a case or please feel free to complete the form below for submission to our law firm if you would like more information about your possible employment claim.  A representative will review it and  contact you. Please allow one  business day for someone to contact you and if you do not hear back from us then  it is possible that we did not receive it. This is a FREE consultation and you will not be charged for this call. Also please be advised that, merely by submitting this form, no Attorney-Client relationship is formed with the law firm.  The ONLY way that an Attorney-Client relationship with  the Law Office of Rose H. Robbins is formed is by specifically written  agreement signed by you and the Law Office of Rose H. Robbins.  You must provide your name,  home  or cell phone number and your zip code and all remaining fields are optional.

Comments Off

Filed under Fair Labor Standards Act ["FLSA"], FLSA, Illegal immigrants, Undocumented Workers

OVERTIME WAGE VIOLATIONS TYPICAL IN INDUSTRIES EMPLOYING IMMIGRANTS

Typical industries where there are many violations of overtime wage pay are : agriculture; day care, restaurants, garment manufacturing, guard services, health care, hotels & motels, janitorial services and temporary help.  An employee can start a private lawsuit to enforce their rights. Although the Department of Labor can, and does, sue employers in federal court to enforce FLSA laws,  Congress has provided that  in litigation the employer must pay the attorneys fees of an employee who succeeds.  Thus, there is a strong incentive for attorneys to fight vigorously in this arena.  You may contact the Law Office of Rose H. Robbins  (using the form below or calling us at: (954) 946-8130) to see if you have a case which we would accept on a contingency basis.

Comments Off

Filed under Undocumented Workers, Unpaid Overtime Wages, Day care, Restaurants, Garment manufacturing, Guard services, Hotels & motels, Janitorial services, Temporary help, Agriculture, Fair Labor Standards Act ["FLSA"]

Wage and Hour Division (WHD) Protects Certain Visa Holders

  Wage and Hour Division (WHD)  of  the United States Department of Labor Administers/Enforces Certain Major Laws such as:

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the federal law commonly known for minimum wage, overtime pay, child labor, recordkeeping, and special minimum wage standards applicable to most private and public employees. FLSA provides the agency with civil and criminal remedies, and also includes provisions for individual employees to file private lawsuits. The 1989 Amendments to FLSA added a provision for civil money penalties (CMP) for repeated or willful minimum wage or overtime violations. (Since 1974, FLSA has contained a similar CMP provision for child labor violations.)

Wage and Hour has certain responsibilities under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These include: (1) enforcement of the labor standards protections for certain temporary nonimmigrant workers admitted to the U.S. under several programs (D-1, Crewmembers; H-1B, Professional and Specialty Occupation Workers; H-1C, Nurses; H-2A Agricultural Workers); and (2) inspection for compliance with the employment eligibility verification recordkeeping requirements (I-9 reviews).

Comments Off

Filed under Undocumented Workers, Unpaid Overtime Wages, H-2B, D-1, H-1B, H-1C, H-2A, Fair Labor Standards Act ["FLSA"]

Undocumented restaurant workers may proceed with FLSA claims and lead a class rules a Judge in US District Court

Judge rules that undocumented Workers may proceed with FLSA claims and lead a class in US District Court, District of Massachusetts. Basis for ruling centers on well-supported analysis that employers should not benefit from failure to pay minimum wages and overtime to undocumented workers and that immigration policy is supported by taking away this incentive from employers.

Excerpts from Opinion and Order  of March 23, 2011 in Plaintiffs,v. CHINATOWN RESTAURANT CORP., JOYCE P.Y. HAYES, and WILLIAM WAINRIGHT,

“Employees of the Chinatown Restaurant Corporation (“Chinatown”) have brought suit for unpaid minimum wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and its state-law counterparts. Pending before me are several motions to compel discovery. Chinatown has moved to compel the plaintiffs’ responses to written discovery seeking information about their immigration status and has opposed the plaintiffs’ motion to compel its responses to written discovery seeking information about class members. Relying on Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), Chinatown asserts that illegal aliens cannot recover unpaid wages, and by extension cannot represent a class seeking unpaid wages.
In Hoffman, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) lacked the discretion to award back pay to illegal aliens whose employment had been terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.. Id. at 142. The Court reasoned that awarding back pay to illegal aliens undermined federal
immigration policy as expressed in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”), Pub. L. No. 99-603, 100 Stat. 3359 (1986). Id. at 150. “

“This case presents the question whether Hoffman affects illegal aliens’ rights to recover unpaid wages under the FLSA.
Although this case presents a question of first impression in this circuit, other courts around the country that have considered it have answered this question in the negative.”     Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under Undocumented Workers, Unpaid Overtime Wages, minimum wage violations, Restaurants, Fair Labor Standards Act ["FLSA"]